academic research

改革 · 精神 | 中央美院庆祝建党100周年专题展 · 云展厅...

2021-08-30 35 read

艺术作品通过艺术语言的提炼与渲染,最能够表现历史的精神力量,而这种表现具有特殊艺术感染力,跨域时空,历久弥新。本次展览试图以艺术创作的视角来展现中国共产党成立一百周年的光辉历程和伟大精神,展览分为“革命·精神、建设·精神、改革·精神、新时代·精神”四大板块。
More

建设 · 精神 | 中央美院庆祝建党100周年专题展 · 云展厅...

2021-08-26 34 read

为了庆祝中国共产党成立100周年,中央美术学院特别隆重举办“百年征程 精神图谱——庆祝中国共产党成立100周年专题展”。
More

革命 · 精神 | 中央美院庆祝建党100周年专题展正在展出...

2021-08-26 35 read

本次展览受到中央美术学院校领导的高度重视,策划团队历时六个多月,精心策划,在展览展品的选择和策划思路上都进行了深入的讨论和思考,在中国共产党成立100周年的重要时刻,希望做出一个有历史、有故事、有思考、有内涵的展览。
More

绘本工作室 | 2021本科生毕业展作品推介...

2021-06-24 4761 read

因布撤展需要,我馆将于2021年6月21日至6月28日闭馆,6月29日起面向公众开放。由此给您带来的不便敬请谅解,后续展览信息敬请关注最近展览公告。 本科生毕业创作分享① 田丝语 / 《偷伤心的狐狸》刘杉峰 / 《谧境》文洱敏 / 《纸舟》指导老师杨忠 向华 冯烨 冯旭 赵梦雅作品名称:《偷伤心的狐狸》创作者:田丝语微妙的情绪是生命体验的一部分,但我们却难以用语言去表述它们。往往我们还没有找到合适的词汇,它们就瞬息流淌而去了。作者认为,伤心一词本就包含了成千上万种不同的感受,因此将每一种伤心视觉化,以一只喜欢欣赏并收集伤心的狐狸作为主角,制成一本故事绘本,展现了情绪的世界。故事的最后,獾看到的却是不一样的伤心,它给作品留下了一个具有转折和留白意味的结局。《偷伤心的狐狸》成书 绘本内页 狐狸是偷伤心的专家,这些是它出门必备的装备。狐狸趁着人们睡着,从人心里长出的森林里,总能捕捉到伤心。狐狸捕捉了一个又一个的伤心,可是却没有獾的伤心。狐狸不明白为什么,于是它请獾来自己的洞穴里做客,给獾展示了自己的伤心收藏品,还有它引以为傲的私人伤心海。獾却说:“伤心多,是因为你看它多;伤心大,是因为你看它大。我看它什么也不是……”狐狸听獾这么说,回头看了看自己的收藏,它会看到什么呢?亲爱的读者,伤心就像色彩斑斓的海洋一样,是人们生命色彩的一部分,但有时候,它也像一缕捉不到的烟一样轻飘飘的、无足轻重。希望每个人都能从自己的角度欣赏这个故事。  扫一扫,添加作者联系方式微博:@思愚SiyuIns:@siyu_tian1999邮箱:szeyutin123456@163.com作品名称:《谧境》创作者:刘杉峰如果有一个奇妙的地方,看上去苍茫千里却渺无人烟,那里安静沉默却又生机勃勃,那里的植物都肆意的生长,那里溪流小河都在涓涓流淌……第一眼看上去不过是一个人迹罕至的雨林,但是当你一页页往后翻的时候,一个不可思议的世界展现将在你的面前。你绝不会想得到,这片广袤的土地竟然是……《谧境》成书 绘本内页 这是一座长满了棕榈和蕨类的大山。朝霞像一只温柔的大手缓缓抚摸着大地。大地也被慢慢照亮,一群蚂蚁出来觅食。沿着毛茸茸的草丛中间的溪流,蚂蚁们继续向着目的地进发。蚂蚁采到可口的叶子回家去了,不过在洞穴湖泊的花丛间,蜜蜂也被花香吸引过来。洞穴的深湖像蓝宝石似的眼睛凝望着天空。层层叠叠的叶子间,有两只看上去很特别的蛾子也飞了出来,像是在跟这片大地玩着躲猫猫。下雨了。雨越下越大…… 可远处的山的形状越来越不对劲儿了。就像是在望着他俩似的。蛾子也像是旅途终点前最后的小憩似的,在胸膛似的石壁上停了下来。稍微休息一会再飞吧。喝点水,歇歇脚,说不定还能唱个歌吹吹笛子。“看,我们找到你啦!”“我其实一直都在这儿呀。”“这么快就要走了吗?你们还会回来吗?”“回来的时候,再一块玩呀!”看到这里,想必大家都已经明白了,这是一本讲述树懒身上生长雨林的故事。您可能会问了,“树懒身上怎么会长雨林呢”,可实际上,树懒的确是为数不多的,会和大量的藻类和真菌共生的哺乳动物。树懒为这些微小的生物提供了庇护所,而这些藻类和真菌也为树懒提供了绝佳的隐蔽伪装,是的树懒这一堪称地球上最慢的生物能在强手如云的热带云林中繁衍至今。而又正因为树懒的和热带雨林中的激烈竞争形成了鲜明的反差,才让树懒有了一种遗世独立的小神仙似的姿态。更进一步来说,树懒身上的那些藻类和微生物也像是一个小小的雨林,庇护着树懒蛾等等在树懒身上生活的小动物。随书附赠的小册子详细标注了绘本中每一页树懒的具体动作。采用折页的形式,初看是雨林,打开之后才知道是一只完整的树懒。扫一扫,添加作者微信微博@Anling-木三ins@l.s.f_aling作品名称:《纸舟》创作者:文洱敏这是一本幻想故事类的无字绘本,描绘了以纸舟为线索展开的诗意幻想之旅。拥有纯真想象的人借助纸舟进入自然奇境,收获快乐与治愈回到现实,而纸舟将继续迎接下一个诗意旅程……《纸舟》成书绘本内页我的创作灵感来自于童年的经历与对悠然生活、自然物的喜爱。每个人都有从简单事物中获得快乐与想象的经历。在我幼时,草地上一辆废弃小车、熟悉的河畔发现从未见过的无名小鱼、一张可以叠出万物的白纸,这些平凡到被称为垃圾的事物曾给我带来许多乐趣。渐渐的,单纯无忧虑的时光远去;不知从某天起,我总是处在各种各样的牢笼里,周围不再是草木山水;我差点忘却这种简单,不知如何在日益复杂的世界中找寻快乐。“何处无月…但少闲人如吾两人者耳”,其实只是抬头看看云,听窗边鸟鸣,河边漫步,让思绪暂时飘飞。世界上到处都有云,世界上没有两片相同的云,每一片都可以是新的想象新的故事。封闭屹立的小岛和飘然自由的小船,象征着现实与幻想。无字书像小船一样是自由的,希望读者能在无言的图画中读出许多小故事,身处枯燥或繁杂的现实中能找寻一份诗意、一份幻想。微信:yimiwem微博:薏弭ins:yimiwem本科生毕业创作分享②王一玮 / 《近视迷局》折宇 / 《毛毛的世界》陈庆虹 / 《水晶球》指导老师杨忠 冯烨 向华 冯旭 赵梦雅作品名称:《近视迷局》创作者:王一玮《近视迷局》是一本关于视觉的无字实验绘本。讲述一个近视的小女孩,她叫秃头女孩,是一个性别特征模糊、长相焦虑的形象。她偶然在桌上发现一副眼镜,戴上之后,世界变清晰了。但她这副眼镜和我们普通的近视眼镜很不一样,透过这副眼镜,世界像一个迷。无力的现实与不可能的真实之间常常以一种被称为“焦虑”的普遍情感联系起来。小女孩由于发现清晰世界和想象中的不同之后,她很慌张地逃跑,但不幸撞上一棵大树,眼镜片碎掉了。世界也变成碎片的了,碎掉的世界反而更加平静,秃头女孩儿躺在草地上又重回平静。眼见不一定为实,那么内心平静是一种可以被确认的真实吗?请滑动观看——>《近视迷局》成书绘本内页微博:@王家二玮Ins:@2wei_art邮箱:1416541923@qq.com作品名称:《毛毛的世界》创作者:折宇毛毛出生在一座大森林里,在他眼中,世界就是这片没有尽头的丛林。这里有生活的惬意也有无处不在的危险,他深爱着自己生活的世界,并且接受一切变化,慢慢长大……毛毛的世界,究竟是怎么样的呢?就让我们一起去看看吧!《毛毛的世界》成书绘本内页毛毛出生在一座大森林里。这里到底有多大?他也不知道。毛毛用森林提供的材料搭了一个小窝。他爱他的小窝。可是,这里总会下起很大的暴风雨。一不留神,毛毛的小窝就被冲走了。当然,有一些东西是毛毛不想要的。森林就是这样,因为太大了,什么都会有。你接受好的,也得接受坏的。毛毛从不抱怨。叶片开始飘落,毛毛仔细辨认,确定不是自己把它们涂成黄色。“为什么呢?”他还没有想明白,就已经困了。不管世界有多大,不管世界怎样变化,毛毛都不害怕。他安心地等天气转暖,等春天到来。到那时候,他也会长大。周边展示请滑动观看——>扫一扫,添加作者微信作品名称:《水晶球》创作者:   陈庆虹绘本以一个玩具水晶球——“球球”的视角,讲述了“球球”与以前的好朋友小兔子分别很久之后,在某一天“球球”被带到了医院的一间白色的层流病房,并在这里和以前的朋友小兔子终于重逢了。从此“球球”就一直陪伴住在病房里不能出去的小兔子,直到走过小兔子生命中最后一段时光。这本绘本的画面视角转换于水晶球的内外交织、对比,一场注定以离别为结局的陪伴正在发生……请滑动观看——>《水晶球》成书绘本内页球球住在水晶球里。她已经很久没有出现了...真的太久、太久了。飘呀,荡呀,晃晃悠悠呀......床边的小瓶子堆积起来,“糖果”吃得越来越多......一定是梦太香甜,所以不愿醒来吧......大三第一次做的小书《水晶球》来源于在工作室学习期间第一次制作的属于自己的小书。从前的这个故事更多的是描写我自己的当下最真实的状态——在内向,不自信和焦虑的情绪之下,与外界环境割裂的自我封闭是对自己的一种保护吗?在这个时候,封闭的水晶球能够很好地描述我的状态,也许因为有一层玻璃外壳而反而可以更好地保护自己。生活在永远安全的地方,就永远不会有烦恼和危险......扫一扫,关注作者微博微博:_Jiong每天都想吃桃微信:OnoDkuneins:jiongccc本科生毕业创作分享③高歌 / 《叮咕隆咚锵》陈森林 / 《梯城》张楠 / 《魔法师的帽子去哪了?》指导老师杨忠 冯烨 向华 冯旭 赵梦雅作品名称:《叮咕隆咚锵》创作者:高歌《叮咕隆咚锵》用叮叮咚咚的拟声词和有惊喜感的大开页向大家展现了一个喧闹的春天。故事讲述的是惊蛰时节调皮的小雷公“叮咕隆咚”用他的小锣吵醒万物,并且送去动物们并不需要的春天礼物。《叮咕隆咚锵》成书绘本内页扫一扫,关注作者微博微信:AOE5016488作品名称:《梯城》创作者:陈森林《梯城》是一本关于普通人在平凡生活中自我和解的故事。绘本中主角是一个小黄人,它的职业是一名粉刷匠。它每一天的工作就是去粉刷梯城的每一处角落。工作枯燥又乏味,甚至还有一些危险。但是当夜幕降临,月光闯入了梯城,故事开始了改变......原来,当一天工作结束后,不管内心是劳累,是孤独,是落寞,还是困惑,小黄人都会去收集自己的珍贵,当面对自己的珍贵时,再大的苦难都不值得一提。珍贵, 可以是每一张邮票,可以是每一张电影票,可以是孩子成长的每一天,甚至可以是每一次心跳,每一口呼吸,每一种情绪。那么,你的珍贵又是什么呢?《梯城》成书绘本内页扫一扫,关注作者微博微博:碳气-微信t:Fance-C作品名称:《魔法师的帽子去哪了?》创作者:张楠《魔法师的帽子去哪了》是一本游戏书。这本书的故事很简单:魔法师有一顶魔法帽,这个帽子拥有千百万种魔法,不可估测的能量——但被一只小黑猫偷走了。魔法师非常着急,和他聪明的猫头鹰一起,路上寻找着黑猫的蛛丝马迹,但同时,戴在黑猫脑袋上的魔法帽,不由自主地使出了魔法……请滑动观看——>《魔法师的帽子去哪了》成书绘本内页作为游戏书,更重要的是游戏的方式。我随故事的节奏,设计了一些简单的机关来辅助叙事,读者在阅读的时候,就好像在玩一个交互游戏,一张图所表现的不仅仅是一个瞬间,更是一个有时间、空间的立体画面。在阅读本书的时候,除了体验主角经历的故事,还能帮助主角,一同解决问题。比如在故事最后用到的魔法杖,就是读者在前面的场景里帮魔法师找到的。我试图在绘本的形式中探索新的可能性:可读并且可玩。扫一扫,添加作者微信微博:芳心纵水犯99544本科生毕业创作分享④陈子杰 / 《斑·马》罗宇妙 / 《双向拥抱 》程雨菲 / 《三姐妹》指导老师杨忠 冯烨 向华 冯旭 赵梦雅作品名称:《斑·马》创作者:陈子杰“每个大人都曾是个小孩,只是后来他们忘记了。”被涂上魔法油漆后获得奇妙能力的胖斑马在城市里胃口大开,被它吃下后再拉出来的物体都会染上条纹,他吃下了洗衣机、汽车、大楼……甚至吃掉了月亮!吃得越来越多,身体越来越大,用条纹改变了全世界,而一切的一切结束之后,又会发生什么呢?意在探究“荒诞”与逻辑在绘本中的创造性,由此思考绘本创作中“意义”与“无意义”的内在联系。《斑·马》成书绘本内页这是一个适合睡懒觉的好天气,也是一个适合刷油漆的好天气。哎呀!胖白马被粗心的油漆工人刷成胖斑马啦!他突然觉得肚子好饿……可是花朵的味道好奇怪,还有什么好吃的呢?胖斑马好饿好饿,洗衣机、大狮子和摩天大楼纷纷被他吃了下去,他们分别变成了螺旋纹洗衣机、条纹狮子和条纹大楼!胖斑马越来越大,越来越大…月亮被胖斑马一口吞下啦!胖斑马放了一个超级条纹屁,把全世界都变成了条纹的模样!黑白相间的雨把一切都冲褪了色,胖斑马身上混合了所有颜色,变成了胖黑马,他好累好累,终于可以好好睡一觉了……诶?粗心的油漆工人又来啦!扫一扫,关注作者所有国内社交平台:HARU老哈哈哈来找我玩8!作品名称:《双向拥抱》创作者:罗宇妙“不可以逃避,不可以哭泣。”“要永远笑着,要永远歌唱。”我们总是被提醒,要坚强一些,要勇敢一些,要更努力一些。在高速运转的钢铁森林之中,好像容不下一丝丝怯懦,一点点眼泪。可是,会哭会笑,有光有影,才是万物本身呀。这是一个由“积极情绪”与“消极情绪”两相互相接纳的故事。悲伤有什么意义?什么是圆满?或许你可以在这里找到答案,与自我和解。双相拥抱,双向拥抱。《双向拥抱》成书绘本内页流星滑落,一切的故事要开始了……咦?茧里冒出了什么?光灵尘灵他们一直都在一起,但是有人却排斥悲伤。他们一直往下坠……“你需要伪装。”他们见到枯萎的花灵花灵开花了。他们来到了末之海。小尘用理解安抚了他。光与尘双向拥抱。他们成为了一体。扫一扫,添加作者微信Lofter:妙嗷呜微博:妙嗷呜-Miaooo作品名称:《三姐妹》创作者:程雨菲《三姐妹》讲述了三种不同的人所发生的故事。直尺姑娘、圆规姑娘,角尺姑娘有三种不同的测量标准,她们既是同源的三姐妹,也是性格相异的三个个体。当你我之间的原则发生了对立时,该如何处理?我通过三姐妹之间的故事,探讨了相异个体之间的共存之道。请滑动观看——>《三姐妹》成书绘本内页大姐直尺姑娘,二姐圆规姑娘和三妹角尺姑娘有三座美丽的花园,她们每天都在测量自己的花朵,都认为自己的花是最美的。当直尺姑娘的花伸进圆规姑娘的花园里时,圆规姑娘认为自己花园的美被破坏了,这引起了三姐妹之间的争论。这时,一条毛毛虫出现了,它给三姐妹出了道题,谁能回答出来谁的花就最美。然而,固执己见的三姐妹都认为自己的答案是对的,不服气的打了起来,于是她们建起了围墙,开始冷战。她们变得越来越不快乐,却不知道是为什么。最后,变成蝴蝶的毛毛虫飞了回来,告诉了三姐妹谁的答案是正确的...微博@Faye_Cheng_扫一扫,添加作者联系方式微博:@Faye_Cheng_ins:faye_chengc邮箱:18330013805@163.com本科生毕业创作分享⑤余雪连 / 《太阳虫》冀炯旭 / 《不知道》李铭慧 / 《流光》指导老师杨忠 冯烨 向华 冯旭 赵梦雅作品名称:《太阳虫》创作者:余雪连太阳虫是一则简单的寓言--故事发生在只有黑夜和迷雾的世界。蛰伏在地下不知多少年的蝉,破开了蛹壳,来人间一趟,也想去看看太阳,她要去太阳上唱一支单纯的歌,一直唱到生命的尽头。躲在地底的老鼠,日复一日过汲汲营营的生活。它苦而不知其苦,困于幽暗的地底,满身灰尘--世上幸好是有蝉的,蝉儿们抱着决绝的勇气,在无尽的虚空里放声歌唱。这本书便是想讲述一种从沉寂世界中诞生的浪漫,它出于心灵追寻温暖的单纯本能,这种本能跨越个体之间的鸿沟,跨越时空的距离。它一则简单的寓言,也是一个祈愿--以此书送给黑暗中蛰伏的人们,我们终将于煌煌日光下相见。《太阳虫》成书绘本内页糖果星球上埋藏着数不清的宝藏一只小小的老鼠,每天挖个不停可是,就算他再努力,推车也总是空空的 咦?今天有意外的收获 这个闪闪发光的家伙,是什么呢?“嗞嗞……嗞嗞……” 怪石头发出声音,像是在唱歌唱什么呢?老鼠怎么也猜不透这是一颗从没有阳光降临的星球,又黑,又冷“你的身上很亮,我的身上很暖……”老鼠心里想“没准儿,我们互相需要。”糖果星球的夜晚太长了实际上,这里永远也等不到天亮老鼠有忙不完的工作,挖不完的洞,找不着的糖果留在家里的怪石头骨碌碌地转骨碌碌,骨碌碌……蜕去石壳儿,摇摇晃晃 她是那样斗志昂扬,大声唱道:“天就要亮了!去找太阳吧!”“太阳?”闻声赶来的老鼠说“你不是在开玩笑吧?”“太阳从来不是玩笑,我的朋友。太阳是真实的存 在!”小虫大笑着说扫一扫,添加作者微信微博:-连雨山-作品名称:《不知道》创作者:冀炯旭本书为幻想类故事绘本。故事讲述了一个饥肠辘辘的小猴子被调皮的不知道果戏弄并被带入了不知道森林,森林里有什么?是充满奇珍异果的天堂,还是危机四伏的邪恶之地呢?别问我,我也不知道。《不知道》成书绘本内页“饿死了!饿死了!”小猴子找不到吃的,肚子饿得咕咕直叫。“啊!谁打了我的头!”“不知道!不知道!”这颗“不知道果”只会说这三个字,小猴子不管那么多了,尝一尝不就什么都知道啦。小猴子追着逃跑的不知道果钻进一个树洞。“哇——!”映入眼帘的是各种奇怪的花、奇怪的树,这些东西甚至在他的梦中都不曾出现过。不知道果在逃跑中掉入水里,小猴子怕他有危险,立刻跟着跳了下去。缓过劲儿后,不知道果拽起小猴子,带他来到一处结满奇珍异果的地方。小猴子和不知道果吃啊吃,吃啊吃,两个人都吃的肚子圆滚滚,撑的直打嗝。“最后一口,再吃最后一口……”小猴子看着眼前晶莹剔透的一簇果子,忍不住诱惑,伸出手去。“轰隆——轰隆隆——”突然从地下冒出许多可怕的植物,漏出獠牙,张开大嘴,将小猴子和不知道果团团围住。危机时刻,不知道果大口吸气,让身体鼓成大圆球,带着小猴子腾空飞起,脱离了险境。扫一扫,添加作者微信微博:糖醋坛子鸡ins:piniyuni作品名称:《流光》创作者:李铭慧“光同万物相约,流淌着,践行每一个微小的约定,都不会被落下……”本书以“光”这一诗性意象作为线索,阐释浪漫的“约定”。用明亮的黄去朗照,用深邃的黑去包裹。光自黑夜深处奔赴而来,赴同万物的相约。约定铺满天空,暖融融的光铺满心底,让遗憾圆满,让愿景飘扬……光同离开也有相约,化成叶沉静地堆积,然后熄灭掉。收集起这些仍有微光的枯叶,碾碎调成墨水,流淌成下一次约定的缘起。光没有确定的形态和固定的意涵,但她总是坚定地陪伴。她源于每个人心底的执念与呼唤,在宁静浪漫的夜晚,践行每一个约定……《流光》成书绘本内页我和光有个约定是彼此间心守的默契是必会赴约的沉静等待她若不知道路,我会画给她用金色的墨水,书写流动的信息她来了,穿过未眠的灯火攀爬城市的天际线穿过记忆淌成的河流,奔向我纷杂的爬墙虎勾勒出思绪的形状在黑漆漆的夜里,每个小心翼翼的脚步,都印下一颗星星等待像读过的信笺,终于收起出发了一一影子和光有个约定被忽视的存在闪耀起来车辙下的印记诉说着过去四下里金灿灿的,夜与光明伴生风和光有个约定彼此载着对方呼啸前行,流转讯息雨和光有个约定你中有我的湿润,我中有你的明亮用点点滴滴,倾诉脉脉长情光秃秃的枝丫和光有个约定明媚的愿景飘扬起来哗啦啦,哗啦啦还有心,心儿也与光相约内心因践行而坚定光幕拉开,独自坐在舞台上静听思绪窸窸窣窣落下的细语听它们的隐没与聚集听它们的缠绕与疏离听四面八方,赴万物之约的回响从大气里,从缝隙里从暗影里,从沉默里聚集,聚集,铺展成穹宇变成空气的一部分,和高楼交换颜色轻盈地包裹万物聆听每一声呼唤践行,哪怕是最微小的约定也不会落下…扫一扫,添加作者微信微信:haha_lmh微博:李銘哈
More

一段记忆的修复 | 袁运生《水乡的记忆》作品史研究...

2021-04-29 11370 read

“一段记忆的修复——袁运生《水乡的记忆》作品史研究”展览由中央美术学院美术馆主办,展期将持续至5月1日。
More

We=Link: Sideways...

2020-11-19 14646 read

Written by ZHANG GaHistory often began on the periphery and the fringe and ended up sucked in by a centripetal pull, becoming once again the story of the core. It seems the inevitable power of gravity. When in the mid-1990s the Museum of Modern Art reluctantly set up its innocent looking website at the persuasion of Barbara London, MoMA’s evangelist of media art, and a number of other upward-looking curatorial staff[1], the Thing.net, which had recently moved to the still dilapidated West Chelsea neighborhood, had been already, along with its European sister nodes, operating on a different cultural front for some time and its Berlin-styled monochrome website with plenty of perl scripts under the belt, compared to MoMA’s rudimentary html pages, appeared sophisticated enough to rival the mammoth establishment, at least at face value and for the time being.These days are long gone – today, the Thing is still frequented by its old-time confrère, while MoMA has moved on to command the attention of millions online with its immense collection digitized and through a sleek interface design and elaborate web technologies. The recent impeccable installation of Jodi’s My%Desktop (2002) has again proved MoMA’s indisputable licensing power of rectifying the fringe to the center and canonizing the once avant-garde, transforming and elevating the one-person (desktop) show to a collective immersion of visual ensemble.Net.art, and netart or net art (a serendipitously adopted term with a mélange of connotations describing its hybrid contention by origin and heterogeneity by nature[2]), was also later realized by many to have been the last art movement of the 20th century, albeit without a collectively concerted manifesto.[3]By 1997, a few short years after its emergence, net art seemed to have already “reached a dead end or a turning point.”[4] For according to Dieter Daniels, the three fundamental principles that had been pursued by the instigators of early net art, i.e.: “construction of an independent, partly self-designed technological infrastructure; formation of a self-organized community and the collective design and testing of a corresponding model of discourse; development of a form of art specific to the network, exploring the medium’s potential in an experimental, self-reflective way,”[5] had all but been sabotaged by precisely the opposite of what the pioneering visionaries had strived for: commodification of network and territorialization of the online milieu. The web had turned into a distributional and promotional channel propagated by art of all forms and kinds, not to mention that the internet had become the Internet and the economic engine of the next few decades, and more.[6]A signifying indicator of such a demise evidently was also the eventual institutional admission of net art into the 1997 Documenta X while at the same time the miserable failure of the institution’s comprehension of the medium. The presentation was kept apart from the rest of the artworks in an isolated office-like blue-colored room, and the web works were installed on a local area network that would inevitably lead people browsing hypertext links to dead ends.[7]But this presumable deadend also enabled the birth of, probably, one of the best known, or most infamous works of net art: Documenta Done. Upon hearing that Documenta organizers were to take down its official website and package it, along with online projects, and sell it as a CD Rom, Vuk Ćisic, the Slovenian net artist, cloned the entire website prior to it being taken offline and reposted on his own sever with a pseudo press release under the sensational headline “Eastern European Hacker Steals ‘Documenta’ Website.” He then redistributed the Documenta website for free and exhibited it on many occasions and configurations. Asked of his motivation, in lieu of various speculations by commentators that saw the stunt as a typical Dadaist prank or else as an institutional critique of its digital reincarnation, Ćisic replied, “So obviously we were looking for mischief, ways to subvert it.”[8]This exhibition takes the purported net art’s “dead end” as a new starting point to chart a discursive trajectory of the practices since then, in the many manifestations of network-based art. Instead of prescribing it a categorical definition, the exhibition attempts to uncover the variegated developments, diverse strategies, critical positions and aesthetic experiments after the crash of the dot.com bubble, amidst the prevalence of neoliberalism and cognitive capitalism, and the rise of populism and nationalism. Sideways reveals the continuum of the Avant-garde “nettitudes” inherent in the works of these artists.It is within this tradition of mischief that net art marked a particular strand of genealogy with the historical avant-garde. Much like Documenta Done, in the guise of a Dadaist prank, launched a roundabout attack on the artworld’s powerful, subsequent works such as Bumplist (Jonah Brucker-Cohen & Mike Bennett, 2003 - 2020) would devise a mechanism to boot out a subscriber as soon as another user signed up, in order to insinuate a playful take on law and order, or else as in those deceptive clones endlessly propagated in the work of TraceNoizer – Disinformation on Demand (Annina Rüst, Roman Abt, Fabian Thommen, Urs Hodel and Silvan Zurbruegg, 2001), in which users would let go viral a piece of false information so as to perform a counter-surveillance stunt. A more recent incarnation of such an impulse to do away with capitalist consumerism can be found in The Internet . Click (Jonas Lund, 2017). Harron Mirza’s triptych of live feeds of Instagram via VPN (Inappropriate Appropriation, Biter, Toy, 2019) alludes to a complex exchange of artefacts by which we have learned that knowledge sharing is never wishfully innocent, and the global network is always locally conditioned. The seemingly innocuous exercises of artists’ whims underlie a playfully recalcitrant instinct that shares its genes with the fanfares of Cabaret Voltaire[9] and the uncanny persona of Rrose Sèlavy.[10]Sometimes a head-on clash could also be necessary in order to provoke more commotions and therefore sensations. When Knowbotic Research installed their New York debut of Minds of Concern at the New Museum in 2002, they would have been beholden to legal implications should they fulfill the work as conceived, and that could have led to potentially shutting down the exhibition and other unpleasant consequences. In this Art Hacking Show, the Knowbotic Research artists had planned to use Security Scanner to unveil the IP addresses of various grassroots organizations and media artists to bring to public attention the vulnerability and security loopholes in cyberspace among these ill-protected front-liners, thus to directly engage in legal practicalities which would have lasting impact in the political ecology of the internet. Such real-world intervention also finds its predecessors in the likes of Dada, Fluxus, Situationists, and even in the provocateurs of Conceptual Art. Hans Haacke, for example, who had repeatedly made his patron museums anxious and uneasy, if not more in recent records of performance art. In Domestic Tension (2007), Wafaa Bilal, the Iraqi-born artist, staged a situation in which highly divided American options on the controversial Iraq war were mirrored by those who were drawn by the temptation of “shooting an Iraqi” (the work’s online tagline) to virtually pull a trigger that via the internet would physically shoot from a robotically controlled gun a paintball at the artist, confined 24/7 in a gallery-transformed living space, and those who came to his defense. Through this unforgiving online exchange, the political complexities of the Iraq war were made open not only symbolically but also experientially, alongside it the mysterious gamification of killing was stripped bare.Cultural spaces are also marketplaces, the dialectics of the cultural logic is that art teases the market (Banksy comes to mind, for example) and capital loves art. But as the world of wealth is owned by the one percent, so is the art market. Paolo Cirio determined that the astronomical auction prices should be redistributed via the supposedly democratic reshuffling of the internet. A derivative can be earned by buying a Jasper Johns at a fraction of the Sotheby’s auction price. The artist clearly was serious about the sale but not just striking a symbolic gesture. Real action vs. speculative auction.In examining contemporary art from the 1970s onward, art historian Hal Foster contended that “The shift in conception — from reality as an effect of representation to the real as a thing of trauma — may be definitive in contemporary art.”[11] Today the traumatic and the abject prevail online as a parallel world of misery and wretchedness. With relentless rants and raves, bombastic swerves and vortex, Ubermorgan once again unapologetically forces upon us a squeamish reality as is rampant in the likes of the ultraright Breitbart publicity, where “transhumanists, fashionable fascists, anti-vaxxers, incels, and Silicon Valley supremacists” roam.  Breitbart Red’s stylized propaganda and sensational catchlines are reminiscent of the indelible memory of destruction. Disruption comes in many styles and flavors. When Wolfgang Staehle set up The Thing BBS in a basement on White Street in Tribeca in 1991, he wasn’t thinking in such lofty terms as to overthrow something, but rather desired an act of enabling, the act of taking ownership of the network infrastructure, which, by bypassing the encroachment of a corporate network, the German artist saw as the foundation for the nascent potential of Social Sculpture in the digital era, thus seeded the first social media by the name of art. By the same token, People’s Computing, a rare collection of ZHOU Pengan, which is comprised of antiquated artifacts of the DIY group CFido, electronic dictionary, PDA, Flash animations and Opensource wireless firmware hacks, sheds light on the forgotten story of the early Chinese Internet culture during its formative years of the late 1990s and early 2000s. The amateurish enthusiasm and self-propagated autonomy mark a striking similarity with the pioneering spirit of their predecessors. Maciej Wisniewski (Netomat, 2002) set out to create a browser for he doubted Netscape’s or Internet Explorer’s navigational logic, which he thought could fixate a way of looking at the world and cast consumer behaviors in the interest of companies. In the case of Name.Space, artist Paul Garrin, once a student of Nam June Paik, reinvented himself as an entrepreneur so that he could negotiate with the executives at Network Solutions, which managed and controlled top domain names. Name.Space made headline news in the New York Times, The Economist, etc. The artist wanted to run domain names, too, for a romantically wished-for autonomy and for a new model of service as art – much like the Thing BBS's enactment of network as art. Both predated the soon-to-be buzzword of artworld of the 1990s: Relational Aesthetics proposed by the French curator Nicolas Bourriaud.Disruption elicits invitations, too. Ursula Endlicher (Light and Dark Networks, 2011-2013) and the artist duo Exonemo (0 to 1 / 1 to 0, 2019), among others, were commissioned to sabotage the Whitney Museum of American Art by taking over whitney.org each day at the liminal moments of sunrise and sunset by the invited artist’s self-intuited references and preferences. The precious ten to thirty seconds mark the institution’s generous consent of the validity of net art, and an homage to the self-styled reverie of the avant-garde as Christiane Paul, curator of Whitney’s art port, the museum’s portal to the internet art, spoke about the program; “Using whitney.org as their habitat, Sunrise/Sunset projects disrupt, replace, or engage with the museum website as an information environment.”[12] Perhaps it is a euphemism for a new kind of Institutional Critique of the information age. Capital absorbs, culture assimilates, and art re-appropriates, much like gravitation pulls. When Radical Software Group released Canivore, an open source packet sniffing library, they offered their own line of flight about data types, operators, control structures and functions in a flare of manifesto, not unlike the romantic outcry of the world-change ethos of the Futurists, they called it Notes for a Liberated Computer Language.[13] Although Carnivore in the end was no more than a data visualization toolkit, its radicality lies in its intrinsic disobedience to the given norms, whether the clandestine appropriation of FBI surveillance software or the radicalization of programming language itself. It was only later revealed that the core members of the group, Eugene Thacker and Alex Galloway, were on their way to become radical theorists of media culture.The hacker instinct has always been part of the genes of net art. It still thrives today after a short pause during a period some dubbed the post-internet, which more or less was a misnomer if not a misconception. In default filename tv (2019), Everest Pipkin exposed the backstage logic of YouTube videos. His mesmerizing installation of Lacework (2020) again is an ingenuous improvisation of one hacker’s persistence to turn vastly mundane datasets into a new expression of generative sublime. In We leak (2020), Leon Eckert and Vytas Jankauskas have extended the legacy of Carnivore to give a fresh 2020 update of the original, albeit quite idiosyncratically. The visual is now substituted by the audible to resonate with the surrounding sound of Alexas. “Every time a packet goes through its local network, the device will announce it being logged. If a plain-text packet gets intercepted, its content will be read aloud.”[14] If data visualization is a representation of probable messages, then We leak unforgivingly tells the uninterrupted truth. Noise removed, entropy defeated, and pure information attained.Artists were sincerely excited and inspired when the arrival of the internet finally seemed capable of fulfilling the telematic embrace that had been dreamt about for decades. It was not only a way to communicate bi-directionally or through multi-nodal hyperlinks as promised in a decentralized network, but also through which a new form of autonomy implicit of a literal realization of the Beuysian “Everyone is an artist” could come true or that now, at last, everyone could indeed have his / her fifteen minutes of fame. Net Art Generator (Cornelia Sollfrank, 1999) was a classic of such aspirations. That tradition continued to update itself into mobile phones with the 2013 creation of Raoul Pictor Mega Painter (Hervé Graumann / Matthieu Cherubini, 2013). The App store tagline reads “With Raoul Pictor Mega Painter you can make art whenever you want and wherever you want.”At a time when Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook and WeChat reign supreme, online social networks have grown ever more homogenized, it is cognition capitalism working at its best: consumption of freedom and democracy are among the most profitable under the scrutiny of corporate gazes. Guo Chen set out to dispute such premediated habitats of social media. In Wind Verification (2020) he transforms user uploaded video clips of the invisible force of wind into embodied sensory experience in the physical space of the gallery – a fan blows out the wind aligning with the directions of virtual wind in the video. It is an illuminating gesture of the unanimous many weaved into the potential of a storm in the making in a world in which the unreal is no less real than the real.Lauran Lee McCarthy teamed with Kyle McDonald have distributed a product that “tracks, analyzes, and auto-manages your relationships.”[15] The app pplkpr (2015) conveniently automates one’s social life. Like many of her works, the overly optimistic anticipation of technologically optimized life is often infused with sarcasm and castigation about the very things it proselytizes. Likewise, in Later Date (2020) her seemingly melancholic sentimentalism was nevertheless evocative of wit and hope. It is the “zany, cute and interesting” as the aesthetic supplements (as opposed to the dire prescriptions of Hal Foster) for a critique of the new reality, as Sianne Ngai aptly articulated in her 2012 volume Our Aesthetic Categories.When Heath Bunting interrupted the routines of the Kings Cross Station in London on August 4 1994 by inviting people, via email, to call in from all over the world, it seemed a reminiscence of John Cage’s 1966 ambitious episode Variation VII, during which he had ten telephone lines set up in various locations in New York City and the incoming voices would be mixed and amplified with other mechanical (blender, juicer, fan), environmental (Geiger meter), and physiological (pulse generator)[16] sounds onside transmitted via sensors by the performers at the Armory for the legendary 9 Evenings of performance. Of course, Bunting's setup was not nearly as sophisticated as Cage’s and the purpose was also different. It foreshadowed that net art was from the beginning not just something that happened on a web browser, but a much more extended scope of operation even though in those days the net could mostly only be experienced through a browser window. Today, we ever more understand that the net is the membranes of a symbiosis which connects machines with blood vessels, in dialogue with elongated rivers and lands, intercepts wind and rain, permeates from the tangible to the invisible. The networks bricolage silicon with flesh, traverse the organic through to the inorganic, fusing humans and nonhuman, all reciprocal and comingling. A new generation of artists are particularly sensitive toward this precarious posthuman condition in which we live and by which they make art. An intricate installation triggered by online users that in turn feeds back to the browser behavior with the unflattering title Miasma of the Rocks (CHEN Pengfei, LIU Xing, LIANG Yuhong, XU Haomin and ZHAO Hua, 2020) is characteristic of such reciprocity of human-machine mutuality rippling through bodies and networks, akin to the posthuman explication in the words of Cary Wolfe:It comes both before and after humanism: before in the sense that it names the embodiment and embeddedness of the human being in not just its biological but also its technological world, the prosthetic coevolution of the human animal with the technicity of tools and external archival mechanism…. [It] comes after in the sense that it names a historical moment in which the decentering of human by its imbrication in technical, medical, informatic, and economic networks is increasingly impossible to ignore.[17]ZKM | Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe was prescient to organize a show in 1999 after “the dead end of net art,” titled net_condition before most art institutions had come to an awakening that a new epoch had descended and it would be defined by the network. The net condition has reaffirmed, by now, a perpetual condition, and it is a posthuman condition with the net condition as its circulatory and respiratory prerequisites. In a world that is stricken by a rampant pandemic and virulent misinformation, a world bankrupted by corporate rapacity, a world of tumults and crises, accelerated by glorious artificial intelligence in the feedforward anticipation of the Kurzweilian transhuman singularity; a world of hardened passion and redemption, a world in every way reminiscent of the fertile ground in which the Avant-garde germinated and thrived, net art, the last avant-garde of the 20th century, may once again at this “turning point” take up that Quixotic spirit of intrepidity and strive on, once again from the periphery and the fringe – with a little mischief, a pinch of agitation too, via action, through the beautiful, and by sideways, to remake history.[1] Barbara London, Video Art the First Fifty Years (New York: Phaiden Press, 2020), p.184.[2] Josephine Bosma, Netitudes Lets Talk Net Art (Rotterdam: NAi Publications,2011), p.22 - 61.[3] Dieter Daniels & Gunther Reisinger, “Reverse Engineering Modernism with the Last Avant-garde” in Net Pioneers 1.0, eds. Dieter Daniels & Gunther Reisinger (Rotterdam: NAi Publications,2009), p.15.[4] Ibid., p.31.[5] Ibid., p.27.[6] Net Pioneers 1.0, p.31.[7] https://rhizome.org/editorial/2017/mar/02/the-copy-and-the-paste/, accessed 10/18/2020[8] https://rhizome.org/editorial/2017/mar/03/repo-man/. accessed 10/18/2020[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabaret_Voltaire_(Zurich), accessed 10/18/2020[10] Marcel Duchamp’s female alter ego.[11] Hal Foster, The Return of the Real (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1996), p.146.[12] https://whitney.org/artport/commissions/sunrise-sunset. accessed 10/18/2020[13] http://r-s-g.org/LCL/[14] From the work description[15] https://lauren-mccarthy.com/pplkpr. accessed 10/18/2020[16] http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/variations-vii/; https://johncage.org/pp/John-Cage-Work-Detail.cfm?work_ID=272. accessed 10/18/2020[17] Cary Wolfe, What is Posthumanism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010), p.XV.
More

Zhang Zikang: Transformation – Kapoor’s Construction of Nothingness...

2019-11-06 16521 read

Kapoor has extraordinary mastery and sensibility of materials. No matter the volume of the work, he can give full play to the characteristics and potential of materials, instead of just taking them as the language of modeling.
More

Understand Gu Yuan...

2019-10-15 7295 read

There seems to be a special attachment between us - this is not limited to certain incidents or artworks, but more accurately speaking, Gu Yuan and his art is a coordinate in my idea matrix, like the important “points” on a chess manual.
More

Around Leonardo. Pupils, followers, imitators...

2019-09-10 4109 read

This is an exhibition that— in the year of the celebrations of the five-hundred-year anniversary of the death of the Renaissance genius — focuses on the artistic and cultural climate generated by him in his time that from today (and until August 25) proposes in Venice the Levi Foundation in Palazzo GiustinianLolin. “Leonardo e la sua grande scuola” (“Leonardo and his great school”)— this is the title of the exhibition curated by Nicola Barbatelli— exhibits in fact 24 works that illustrate above all the personality of the so-called “leonardeschi”(“Leonardesques”), some of who attended his workshop in Lombardy, when he was in the service of Lodovico il Moro, and the works by the “leonardeschi” largely crystallized on the master’s style, remaining at a sidereal distance from him. However, they had the great merit of spreading, through their travels, the innovative style of Leonardo also in areas outside from his journeys, like Giovanni Agostino da Lodi (not present in the exhibition) in Venice, Bernardino Luini in Switzerland or Cesare daSesto in southern Italy and Rome.This is also remembered by a historian of Venetian art such as Giovanna NepiScirèin one of the essays accompanying the exhibition’s catalogue (still in print).The works of some of them, from Bernardino Luini to Cesare da Sesto, to the beloved pupil Salaì, to Giampietrino to Marco d'Oggiono, are precisely in the Venice exhibition. In some cases, with works of high level such as “Marta e Maria Maddalena” (“Martha and Mary Magdalene”)or “Maddalena con vaso d’unguento” (“Magdalene with an ointment vase”)of Luini, in particular for his ability to combine Leonardo’s sfumatowith a kind of metaphysical rigour that pervades his figures. And  exactly Magdalene herself is represented in one of the symbol-pictures of the exposition, the “Maddalena discinta” (“Bare-Breasted Magdalene”),that next to the preponderant hand of one of the Leonardesques — perhaps Marco d’Oggiono for the curator, perhaps Giampietrino for a great Leonardo scholar suchas Carlo Pedretti, recently passed away — could also see the hand of the master. Peculiar also a large “San Gerolamo in penitenza” (“Saint Hieronymus Penitent”)by Cesare da Sesto, who enriched Leonardo’s language with revivals from the classical art and from Raphael.The Leonardesques’ distinguishing feature remains — variously declined — the compositional smoothness, the use of sfumato, the diffuse illumination, the melancholic beauty of the subjects, the ambiguity of the faces. Leonardo’s sure presence in the exhibition is however represented by a fragment of a study drawing for the lost fresco, “Battaglia di Anghiari” (“Battle of Anghiari”)— of which the Gallerie dell’Accademia exhibit in this period several sheets — and by that of a “Testa di uomo” (“Man’s Head”), gone over again by the hand of a pupil of the artist. The director of the Levi Foundation, Giorgio Busetto, the president of the cooperative party Venice 2000 Foundation, Giuliano Segre and Francesco Stochino Weissof the Beijing Music Festival Arts Foundation yesterday presented in the opening ceremony. As a matter of fact, the exhibition, after Venice, will fly to China, to be shown first in Beijing starting from the early September, and then in other cities in China. In line also with the musical vocation of the Levi Foundation, in the Chinese stages it will also see musical interludes with the Ugo and Olga Levi Venice Ensemble with students of the Benedetto Marcello Conservatory, that will perform Renaissance music with vintage instrumentsand also passages of Chinese tradition.Enrico Tantucci
More

To Hold a “Knowledgeable” Exhibition - Taking “Exhibition of Selected Works from the National Beiping Art School Period” as an Example...

2019-08-07 6774 read

The “CAFA Art Museum (CAFAM) Collection Series: Exhibition of Selected Works from the National Beiping Art School Period” (“National Beiping Art School Exhibition” or “the Exhibition”) is a trademark CAFAM collection exhibition since 2012. It has received good response and acclamations from the society. The Exhibition is one of the few monographic collection series in the domestic art museum world. It is a program worth exploration and reference, in the aspects of its selected topics, exhibitions, academic research, publicity and exhibition period. The article will analyze the intellectual and academic qualities of the exhibition’s content and structure.Living in a world filled with thousands of various exhibitions, including the collection exhibitions, we are still struggling to find meaningful ones in them. It is partly due to the limited level of exhibited artworks, but is further because of the out-of-date curatorial ideas and the result of which, lack of exhibitions with substance and reason. In an era of information explosion, when the information people receive increases greatly, the audience are no longer satisfied with the superficial image of artworks. They have more need for the cultural concept and creative intentions behind the world. The quality of the exhibition’s effect lies in the curatorial team’s ideas, which decide every detail of an exhibition. CAFAM is one of the earliest to raise the idea of producing knowledge in art museums in China. It views the art museums as a public space that produces and provides knowledge, and regards “knowledge production” as the historical responsibility and profession of art museums: “Art museums should be a synthesis of ‘knowledge production’. Every action related to art and culture that happens in an art museum can build up the meanings and values of ‘knowledge’; Art museums should take the production of ‘knowledge’ as its starting point and core meaning.” Art museums have historical responsibility in social education. Its exhibitions represent the professional institutions’ perspectives and attitudes. Through exhibitions they lead to discussions about the artworks, promote research on relevant art history research and the dissemination of artistic concepts, for the public to acquire knowledge and new perspectives on art. This is an important channel for the art museums to practice its function. In this sense, when we hold exhibitions in an art museum, we need to consider what the audience need and what we need to show them.Under the guidance of such concept, every step during the preparation of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition is centered around how to study the collection, how to make the audience understand the artworks, the theme of “Beiping Art School” and how to help the audience understand the exhibition and learn knowledge. This is a common goal for all the collection exhibitions - with real content and attitude, to “study history and collection profoundly and structurally and form an ‘art history’ writing.” 1.  Cultural Responsibilities and Knowledge Production from the Perspective of the Selected Topics of the National Beiping Art School ExhibitionThe topics of collection exhibitions are very important. The topic is the guideline of an exhibition. A good exhibition’s topic must have high academic level, historical sense, and contain social thinkings about the history and modern time, so that it is fresh instead of cliche and powerless; so that new possibilities could generate from the historical collections, while new academic viewpoint and research result can be passed on to the audience; so that the audience could truly learn things and further push forward the art cause.Why choosing the topic of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition? CAFAM has given to it thorough thinking: First, National Beiping Art School is a miniature and milestone of the development of modern art education in China. In the foreword of the first series exhibition it says: “The National Beiping Art School will was not only the fine art education shrine that gathered the best teachers and students and represented modern Chinese art, but also a cultural front that advocated spirits such as art education for all and the combination of art and science.” Many important thinkings, events and figures of modern Chinese art history are interwoven with the history of the National Beiping Art School, especially in Beijing, without the knowledge of the School would make it difficult to understand art during the Republic of China period. Moreover, as the predecessor of CAFA, the School is the foundation of many of CAFA’s heritage. During its 30-year development in Beijing, it had established close relationship with Beijing’s cultural scene, and was one of a significant aspect of Beijing culture. Thus, the National Beiping Art School is an utterly important and meaningful topic in terms of modern art history. Meanwhile, it is also a paradox: As the first national art school of modern China, a nursery ground for a large number of talents, it is still perceived vaguely, shatteredly, and inadequately by the public and even the academic world. In a long period of time, knowledge and research on the Beiping National Art School was in its primary stage. Its historical meaning is still far from well dug into. In this sense, this topic has filled in the gap of Chinese art history, as well as the gap in most audience’s cognition of art. This is exactly the responsibility of art museums. In the early stage of preparation for the Exhibition, CAFAM took the angle of art history research, and tried to bring in a macroscopical and historic thinking. What the museum needs to do is more than the display of artworks, but more importantly to tell a history, to fill the gap in the audience’s knowledge as well as art history research.2. Knowledge Production and Communication of Collection Exhibition from the Perspective of Organization and Execution of the National Beiping Art School ExhibitionThe successful selection of topic has solved an important problem, but why curating such an exhibition? How would the museum hold such an exhibition and will it be able to successfully hold the exhibition? The answers lie in adequate preparation. Only with adequate preparation the exhibition will naturally happen.In the foreword for the first series exhibition that focuses on western paintings, it mentioned four fundamental works regarding the National Beiping Art School: First, the discovery of important artists and artworks; second, organization and protection; third, featured researches on the collections and the National Beiping Art School; digital archiving. It was because these works have made progress that CAFAM was able to begin the exhibition series. Regarding the execution of the exhibition, the curators hope every part of the exhibition could offer adequate information and effective knowledge for the audience, so that they could understand the exhibition in multiple perspectives and levels, and make new discoveries through the exhibition. To achieve this goal, the curators put great effort in the selection, writing and organization of the exhibition, with the hope that the audience could comprehend the essence of the art during the National Beiping Art School period, and construct a succinct but complete image of the School. (1) Choose angles and accurate positioning of the exhibition according to the practical contentThe National Beiping Art School displayed by the Exhibition almost has no trace in most people’s memory, and that’s why a great deal of image archives and researches are needed to enrich the School’s picture. It is a fine art school with comprehensive disciplines, including painting, music, theater and architecture; in its 30 some years history, there were numerous disciplines and complex staff and student groups, which makes it especially important to choose what content the exhibition would display. In recent years, paintings by the first west painting professors Wu Fading and Li Yishi, like Wu’s Portrait of Woman Wearing Qipao and Li’s Portrait of Chen Shizeng (Picture 9), and works by teachers of the later period such as Sun Zongwei, Qi Zhenqi, Wang Linyi are gradually discovered and organized. Adding the original collection of masterpieces by Xu Beihong, Zhang Daqian, Qi Baishi, Huang Binhong, Chen Banding, Chang Shuhong, Wu Zuoren, Ai Zhongxin, Li Keran and Li Kuchan, CAFAM is equipped with a fundamental collection of the National Beiping Art School period. However, the collection is mainly composed of oil painting, Chinese painting, sketches and pastel painting, which is limited in categories and not able to reflect a complete picture of the School. Even so, another research on teachings during the Naitonal Beiping Art School period indicates that these categories exactly echo with the two most important and longest-established departments - western paintings and Chinese paintings. It is based on this fact that the curation of the Exhibition highlights these two departments, in order to show the main image and artistic characters of the School. In order to fully present the highly distinguished conditions and developments of western paintings and Chinese paintings in that period, the exhibition took the form of series exhibition, and held two feature exhibitions separately for western and Chinese paintings.Exhibitions with a specialized angle might not be comprehensive or grand, but they have more advantage in offering effective knowledge and information to the audience. This is a very important function of collection exhibitions. (2) Select exhibited works by academic standard and professional knowledgeExhibited works are traditionally the main body and most important component of an exhibition. The richest and most emphasized content of any exhibition is the exhibited works. To curate a fruitful exhibition for the audience, we must select works with high artistic value. Many of the exhibited works at the National Beiping Art School Exhibition are very precious works with high academic and artistic value, most of which are exhibited for the first time; some have even filled the gap of academic studies, such as Wu Fading’s Portrait of Woman Wearing Qipao, Li Yishi’s Portrait of Chen Shizeng, Portrait of Wang Mengbai in the western painting sector; and Zheng Jin’s Fox, Magnolia and Peacock, and Chen Shizeng’s album in the Chinese painting. With these precious works once again entered the public sphere through the Exhibition, neglected masters such as Yao Manfu, Xiao Qianzhong, Wang Mengbai, Tang Dingzhi, Yu Shaosong, Yan Bolong, Qi Zhenqi, Fang Bowu were also discovered. In the academic world, these works provide more complete materials for research on art history and construction of fine art memory of the Republic of China era; in the social realm, the public enjoy the opportunity of gaining a more complete, honest and richer knowledge of the art of the National Beiping Art School.These works themselves were not labeled with “National Beiping Art School”, neither were they from the same source, so how did we select and gather them up? It was thanks to the extensive effort of exhibition organizers. Every search and categorization of a work is a transmit of knowledge. A especially good point of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition is the serious-minded organization of works based on fact checks. Each and every artwork selected for the exhibition conformed to the exhibition’s standards, and could reflect the message the exhibition would like to pass on. When the exhibition was first organized, CAFAM has clear and strict rules for the works to be selected: First, as the theme is National Beiping Art School, the works must be related with the School - works from the School’s teachers or students, with its date and information clearly recorded, though because of the immature development of researches on the School, we encountered a lot of difficulties in the fact check works. Moreover, the National Beiping Art School people usually generally refer to was founded in 1918 and merged into Central Academy of  Fine Arts in 1949. Since it stopped existing since 1950, with a lot of academic changes happening since then, the works by the right authors must also be created during circa. 1918-1950. This is to guarantee the original presentation of the School’s art styles and to reduce historical misreadings. In order to find most comprehensive collection of works by the National Beiping Art School’s artists, we on the one hand search for names in the School’s staff and student rosters; on the other hand, we went through resumes of artists collected by CAFAM, and located those who were related to the School. After strict screening of works, we selected works that accord with the exhibition standards. But even though, they were not the final selections (all of them were included in the exhibition catalogue for future academic studies). Only the most precious and wonderful artworks were eventually exhibited according to requirements of the exhibition standards and space. The exhibited works could most directly tell the audience what the National Beiping Art School was, and what are the works that could most represent the School. The process of selecting works were also a process of clarifying truth, a process of showing the real picture of works from the National Beiping Art School period. Furthermore, as exhibited works were strictly organized according to the chronological order of the artists’ birth date, it could clearly present the change of era, and make the audience understand more clearly the School’s development in different stages. (3) Organize history and academic background behind works from the perspective of academic research and audience’s acceptabilityAlthough the National Beiping Art School Exhibition was divided into two themes: western painting and Chinese painting, due to the lack of the public’s knowledge of the School, it would confuse the audience if we directly entered narration about the two genres. In this sense, it is particularly important to have a basic research and introduction of the history and development of the School.  Only when the audience understood that part of information that they would understand the artworks’ cultural meaning, historical and artistic value. So firstly, facing the problems of the School’s complicated history of being established and re-established by different governments during the Republic of China period, its confusing naming in different stages and even today, curators conducted basic but clear organization of the history of the School. In the opening exhibition (Western Painting), the curators set up several blocks that provide introduction of the School in text and pictures, to form a vivid, graphic memory of the School. I now list a few of the blocks below: 1) The National Beiping Art School Chronology organized by Cao Qinghui (Picture 14 & 15), which presents detailed time of every change of the School’s name, directors, administrative affiliations, and addresses; 2) Table of the Corresponding Relationships between CAFAM Western Painting Collection’s Authors and the National Beiping Art School History, made by CAFAM, which organizes the exhibited artists’ time of study or teaching at the School, linking abstract history events with concrete paintings and creating a whole piece of picture with the two separate parts; 3) Archives, photos, seals and part of the books collected by the National Beiping Art School Library (Picture 16 - 20), such as the sketch portfolio sent by Zhang Xian to the School in 1936, articles by Xu Beihong and others to mourn Qi Zhenqi’s death, reports on Qi Zhenqi’s death, the School’s 1928 yearbook, archives of all phases of the School collected by CAFA, and “Artworks in Overseas Collections” at the “Realignment” exhibition, etc. These precious and vivid materials carry a great deal of historical message  and traces, bringing the audience to the time of the School, and passing on abundant historical codes to the audience. Meanwhile, the first systematic exhibition of these precious archives further provide materials and fuels to the development of academic research. For instance, in the following “The National Beiping Art School and Art of Republic of China” symposium, a scholar spoke about the Line between the North and the South issue of the Republic of China art based on Zhang Xian’s sketch portfolio.As many artists of this exhibition were unknown to the public, the Exhibition also sorted out complete resume of each artist (Picture 21), including the artist’s photo, birth date and death date, birthplace, alias, education and work experience, and major academic propositions, and mostly importantly, their teaching time and positions at the National Beiping Art School. Through this resume, the audience would know the artists’ achievements, their relationship with the School, and the important roles these people played in the Republic of China art world. In both the western painting and Chinese painting sectors, the artists’ signs and inscriptions were recognized; especially in the case of the seals, preface and postscripts on Chinese paintings, we especially displayed the text recognized by professional scholars alongside the original artworks, so that the audience could compare the text with that in the paintings, to help themselves better understand the works’ intentions.Except for the above mentioned works and archives, the Exhibition also collected, and displayed relevant research materials of the National Beiping Art School, to provide academic researches with more clues and questions, which makes it a good practice of pushing forward research with exhibition. In order to explain the special characters of the School’s period, especially the relationship between teachers’ creative practices and theoretical research (painting studies), the Chinese painting sector of the Exhibition collected and exhibited the first editions of important essays and articles by the exhibited artists published in the Republic of China period. Some of these materials are already academic classics, but there were hardly any chance for them to be gathered together, especially their first edition; in this case, the Exhibition presented a special scenery by linking these articles together with the thread of the National Beiping Art School. Meanwhile, the organization of these materials also provide systematic clue to Chinese paintings created during the National Beiping Art School period and even the Republic of China period (Picture 22). CAFAM saw this exhibition as a platform to gather materials of value in all layers, and through categorization and organization it hopes to see chemical reactions in thinking and research.The Exhibition’s introduction and presentation of history and academic background shows CAFAM’s academic level and vision. Only when the historical relations of the artworks are organized and the stories behind artworks are well told, that the audience would find it easier to understand the exhibition and the knowledge behind it, so as for the effective communication of knowledge. (4) Conduct systematic and focused academic researches and guide the audience through the exhibitionOnly putting good artworks together won’t make a good exhibition. The real value of a work is the historical value and artistic value it carries. Thus the Exhibition proposes to conduct analyses on artworks not from the superficial and isolated angles of their content, techniques, but from their (art) historical background and development, and to appreciate different works and discover their charisma via comparison. Guiding the audience to appreciate artworks is both the museum’s responsibility and requirement for knowledge circulation. Feature research became the partly hidden and partly visible kite string behind, as well as the academic core of the exhibition. It is exactly this idea that the Exhibition would like to affirm, that we should show the audience content and clues through art historical researches, and tell the audience what to see and how to see. All the research of the Exhibition series was centered around the National Beiping Art School’s history from the perspectives that the audience could easily understand, to re-organize the chaotic and complicated history events, and provide the audience with essence of artistic development below the surface.The academic focus of the exhibitions are clearly set according to the paintings’ genre and time. All three exhibitions include Associate Professor Cao Qinghui’s simple but profound feature research. Such a significant research body, tailored specially for an exhibition, is a rare case. In the western painting sector, Professor Cao Qinghui wrote an essay titled “Mainstream, main thread and others”, in which he conducted analyses on collected works and their authors, while linking them to the development of western art in China in the 20th century, so as to organize the main thread of the introduction and practice of western paintings in the first half of 20th century with the National Beiping Art School as an example. Research found out that most of the western painting teachers of the early National Beiping Art School period have studied abroad, so have the teachers from the late period, that’s why their works are closely related to Japan and Europe and involve complicated teacher-student relationships. To put it simply, the main thread of western painting’s development is linked by overseas students and their students; the main stream is the introduction of realistic paintings and the formation of realistic trend and school in 1940s. The main thread of Chinese painting’s development, on the other hand, was narrated by Prof. Cao Qinghui in his essay “The Transformation of Painting Studies Through Broken Shadows of Chinese Painting”. He analyzed main issues the Chinese Painting Department of the National Beiping Art School faced in the 30 some years history, such as the conflicts between western pedagogy and traditional Chinese painting study, conflicts between officers with overseas study background and Chinese faculties, and ups and downs of logic methodologies of painting study, the evolution of Chinese painting and the development of realism. The two essays not only provided distinctive organization and study of the history of western painting and Chinese painting disciplines of the National Beiping Art School, but also clarified the two disciplines’ faculty background, development process and art styles, narrated the major history events of western painting and Chinese painting, and divided the School’s history into clear phases. Based on this solid research result, the exhibition was curated from the two unique angles of overseas study and painting study, which reveals to the point the core question in changes of faculty and art styles during the School’s development. The exhibition thus offered special viewpoints and clues.The practice of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition indicates that except for good artworks, collection exhibitions must also have profound study and systematic organization of collected works. This kind of study should avoid pinning a meaningless academic label on works or exhibitions, which would only confuse the audience. Such study should go through detailed and accurate academic research and organization, should target certain aspects, while also considering the audience’s acceptability. (5)  Set up the museum’s educational responsibility in historical narration through collection exhibitionsThe Exhibition advocates an academic attitude of restoring and envisaging history. This accords with CAFAM’s educational responsibility to restore history and conduct historical narration.The history is full of variety and causal relationships, but it is also hypercritical and forgetful. Many hidden historical events are equally important in their days, and are an important node in the study of history. The lack of avoidance from history will lead to many misreadings, and thus the lost of vitality. In face of these significant problems, CAFAM should present objective exhibitions. The National Beiping Art School Exhibition, when dealing with the National Beiping Art School during the enemy occupation of Beiping  (it was named National Beijing Art School at the moment), gave that history objective positioning and evaluation.A museum’s display and narration of art history should be systematic and consistent, which is an important embodiment of the museum’s educational function. The National Beiping Art School Exhibition boldly experimented on this aspect, and made some achievements in the two exhibitions on western and Chinese painting. It seems that the question of the National Beiping Art School has been answered after systematic organization of the two painting disciplines, but following them CAFAM releases the third exhibition, named “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts” (Picture 23). In the foreword of the exhibition it says: “The museum narration of the National Beiping Art School, CAFA and the evolution of 20th century Chinese art, based on museum collection, has reflected the teachers and students’ creative trends, ups and downs in styles at the School and CAFA in different historical phases of 20th century. It starts to touch upon the relationship between the academy and the society, teachers and students and creative trends. In order for the narration to be more inherently logical, and to establish and dig deep into the historical relations between collected works, our museum believes that it is necessary to conduct specialized organization of the establishment of CAFA by merging the National Beiping Art School and the Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts through collection and archives.” The exhibition will further complete the  narration of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition series, and in the meanwhile facilitate explicit expression of CAFA’s relationship with its two predecessors, to form a “comparatively complete thematic museum narration”. The thinking is based upon a macroscopic narration and sincere attitude towards academic studies, and demonstrates CAFAM’s systematicness and sense of responsibility in terms of its public education function.3. Exhibition as a Component of Museum Knowledge CirculationThe National Beiping Art School Exhibition also went through profound and serious academic discussions about other topics relevant to the School. It expands the exhibition’s influence, generates more research subjects, and truly promotes research in this aspect. The Exhibition is no longer isolated, but has become a component of museum knowledge circulation. During the exhibition, two important symposium and semniar were settled: “The National Beiping Art School and Art of Republic of China” symposium (Picture 24) and “High as Mountains and Long as Rivers: Masters of the National Beiping Art School” seminar (Picture 25). The symposium invited over 40 experts from relevant academic field to speak, the content of which was later edited and published as a book. The seminar includes over ten lectures, each of them was unfolded around an old master from the National Beiping Art School. We have also combined seminars with master and doctor courses, encouraged the students to participate in the seminars and write essays based on the issues and their interested points mentioned in the seminars and the exhibitions. Throughout the development of relevant events, the three exhibitions of the National Beiping Art School Exhibition also continuously brewed and formed a positive cycle.Meanwhile, the Exhibition also practiced CAFAM’s good archiving tradition, editing and publishing the Exhibition’s data and research results. The Exhibition’s publication is not only an exhibition catalogue - it also adds in many works that weren’t exhibited, and significant academic materials that cannot be presented at the exhibition, to make the exhibition’s academic and archival quality more complete. The successive release of the publications also helps preserve and circulate the Exhibition’s research fruits, with they themselves become important research books of the field. It is worth mentioning that CAFAM also produced digital exhibition room for the Exhibition using digital technologies. It recorded the exhibition venue with 360-degree cameras, and linked the exhibition’s information to the visual footage, so that the exhibition’s visual effects could be preserved permanently, and the audience could revisit real site of the exhibition on their computers.A good exhibition shouldn’t be a lecture out of a textbook, but should contain rich thinkings of the curators. It’s like creating an unknown world for the audience to discover themselves. The audience could either achieve something following the route designated by the curators, or discover their own interests and inspirations freely. A good exhibition is not the end point of a research or an isolated event, but should be a transmission shaft that passes on more abundant resources, or a fermenter that incubates more fresh matters.The feature collection exhibition in Chinese museums is only at its beginning stage, and the National Beiping Art School Exhibition is a beneficial experiment. It sturdily completed a thematic series research, pushed forward development of relevant academic fields, and enhanced the public’s knowledge of art in the National Beiping Art School period to a certain extent. In this process, the museum’s curatorial idea was also well represented. Although the content is about works and archives of nearly a century ago, the curatorial idea and approach, as well as the ultimate effect of the exhibition, are new. Picture 1: Poster of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 2: Bus stop light box advertisement design of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 3: Large printing of the photo of the Auditorium of the National Beiping Art School and previous names of the School at all stages, put at the entrance of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 4: Photo wall, archive presentation and seal background at the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 5: Entrance of the “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” Exhibition (3rd Floor). A scroll painting of the National Beiping Art School collected by CAFAM is used as the main image of the exhibitionPicture 6: On-site photo of the “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 7: At the entrance (3rd Floor) of the “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953)”  exhibition. The Chinese inscription of “National Fine Art Academy” by Mao Zedong is used as the main imagePicture 8: On-site photo of the “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953)”  exhibitionPicture 9: Li Yishi, Portrait of Chen Shizeng, Oil on Canvas, 70x130cm, 1920, Collection of CAFAM (This work is one of the two portrait works of Li Yishi from the 1920s that are known to be left to date. It is a very precious artwork and research material)Picture 10: On-site photo of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 11: On-site photo of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” Exhibition. The reading table and provided materials at the exhibition are spoken highly of by the audiencePicture 12: On-site photo of the “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 13: On-site photo of the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 14: The National Beiping Art School Chronology compiled by Professor Cao Qinghui, displayed at the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 15: Seals of the names of CAFA since its establishment in 1918Picture 16: Photo wall of the valuable photos throughout the history of the National Beiping Art School at the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 17: Books collected by the National Beiping Art School Library, displayed at the “Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” Exhibition; displayed on the upper right corner is the sketch portfolio donated by Zhang Xian in 1936Picture 18: Photo of the “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” Exhibition. The painting in the photo is Qi Baishi’s Eagle donated by the artist to the School in 1935. Displayed on the shelf on the left is Ling Wenyuan’s Discussions on Chinese PaintingsPicture 19: Yu Shaosong’s Fu Tang Lei Gao, displayed at the “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” ExhibitionPicture 20: The National Beiping Art School Chronology compiled by Professor Cao Qinghui, once again displayed at the “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953)” ExhibitionPicture 21: The “Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School” Exhibition collected and collated detailed resume of the artists. Many materials are made public for the first time. All the 34 resumes were shown in the exhibition area for the audience to quickly enter the atmosphere of the National Beiping Art SchoolPicture 22: The “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953)” Exhibition organized the representative artworks which were created in the early years after the establishment of the People’s Republic of China and cannot be exhibited on site, and displayed them as a video titled “Artworks in Overseas Collections”.Picture 23: The “Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953)” Exhibition displayed Mao Zedong’s inscription of “National Fine Art Academy” in 1949 for the first time as a piece of workPicture 24: “The National Beiping Art School and Art of Republic of China” symposium was co-held by CAFAM and School of Humanities on April 6, 2013. A group photo was taken after the symposiumPicture 25: “High as Mountains and Long as Rivers: Masters of the National Beiping Art School” seminar was held by CAFAM and School of Humanities in Autumn 2013. It invited renowned scholars in China to conduct lectures on important figures in the history of the National Beiping Art School. The seminar has 10 lectures, and stirred heated discussions.Written by Li Yaochen, Director of Department of Collection, CAFA Art MuseumOriginally published in Issue 6 of University and Art MuseumEdited by Zheng Lijun1. The National Beiping Art School Exhibition has three parts: 1) CAFA Art Museum Collection Series: Selected Works of Western Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School (November 27, 2012 - April 25, 2013); 2) CAFA Art Museum Collection Series: Selected Works of Chinese Painting Created in the Period of National Beiping Art School (June 6, 2013 - December 1, 2013); 3) Realignment: From National Beiping Art School, Yan’an Luxun College of Fine Arts to China Central Academy of Fine Arts (1946-1953) (November 4, 2014 - March 1, 2015).2. The National Beiping Art School Exhibition was listed as one of the Outstanding Exhibitions of National Exhibition Season of Brilliant Collection Works from Art Museums in China by the Ministry of Culture.3. Wang Huangsheng (2012), Art Museum as Knowledge Production, p.13, Central Compilation and Translation Press4. Wang Huangsheng (2012), Art Museum as Knowledge Production, p.14, Central Compilation and Translation Press
More
Quick loginAccount login
  • Mobile phone number will be your login ID
  •  
Use Artron membership to login